The Comprehensive Guide to GHG Accounting for Corporates

The science is clear: to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, we need to rapidly reduce global greenhouse gas emissions and transition to a low-carbon economy. And businesses have a critical role to play in this transformation. As major emitters and influencers, companies have the power and responsibility to lead the way in measuring, managing, and ultimately reducing their carbon footprint.

But to effectively do so, businesses need a robust and reliable system for accounting for their GHG emissions. GHG accounting is the process of quantifying and reporting a company's emissions from all relevant sources, both direct and indirect, across its value chain. By providing a comprehensive and standardized view of a company's carbon footprint, GHG accounting enables informed decision-making, target-setting, and performance tracking on emissions reduction.

However, GHG accounting is not a simple or static exercise. It involves navigating a complex web of technical, organizational, and regulatory challenges, from collecting and verifying emissions data to aligning with evolving standards and disclosure requirements. And with a growing focus on Scope 3 emissions, which include indirect emissions from a company's supply chain and product use, the scope and complexity of GHG accounting is only expanding.

In this guide, we'll provide a comprehensive overview of GHG accounting for corporates, covering the following key topics:

- Understanding GHG Emissions and Accounting Frameworks
- Setting Organizational and Operational Boundaries
- Collecting and Calculating Emissions Data
- Reporting and Disclosing Emissions
- Verifying and Assuring Emissions Data
- Leveraging Technology Solutions for GHG Accounting
- Best Practices and Common Challenges in GHG Accounting
- The Future of GHG Accounting and Reporting

Whether you're a sustainability professional, a financial executive, or a business leader looking to enhance your company's climate performance, this guide will provide you with the foundational knowledge and practical insights you need to build a robust and effective GHG accounting program.

Understanding GHG Emissions and Accounting Frameworks

The first step in any GHG accounting journey is to understand the basic concepts and frameworks that underpin the practice. At its core, GHG accounting is about measuring and reporting emissions of seven greenhouse gases covered under the Kyoto Protocol: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).

These gases are typically measured in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e), which allows for comparison and aggregation of different GHGs based on their global warming potential (GWP). For example, methane has a GWP of 28-36 over 100 years, meaning that one ton of methane is equivalent to 28-36 tons of CO2 in terms of its warming impact.

To standardize and guide the process of measuring and reporting GHG emissions, several international frameworks and standards have emerged, the most widely used of which is the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), the GHG Protocol provides a set of accounting and reporting standards, sectoral guidance, and calculation tools for businesses and other organizations.

Under the GHG Protocol, emissions are categorized into three "scopes":

Scope 1: Direct emissions from owned or controlled sources, such as fuel combustion in company vehicles or boilers.
Scope 2: Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling consumed by the company.
Scope 3: All other indirect emissions that occur in a company's value chain, such as purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commuting, and use of sold products.
While Scope 1 and 2 emissions are relatively straightforward to measure and report, Scope 3 emissions pose a greater challenge due to their complexity, data availability, and lack of direct control by the reporting company. However, Scope 3 emissions are increasingly seen as a critical component of a company's GHG footprint, with many stakeholders expecting companies to measure and manage emissions across their entire value chain.

In addition to the GHG Protocol, there are several other frameworks and standards that companies may use or align with in their GHG accounting, such as:
- The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), a global disclosure system for companies to report their environmental impacts and strategies to investors and other stakeholders.
- The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), which helps companies set emissions reduction targets in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to well below 2°C.
- The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which provides a framework for companies to disclose their climate-related risks and opportunities to investors and other stakeholders.
- The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), which provides a comprehensive framework for sustainability reporting, including GHG emissions and other environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics.

Understanding these key concepts and frameworks is essential for any company embarking on a GHG accounting journey. But it's just the starting point. To effectively measure and report emissions, companies need to make several key decisions and take concrete steps to implement their GHG accounting program.

Setting Organizational and Operational Boundaries

One of the first and most critical steps in GHG accounting is to define the organizational and operational boundaries of the reporting company. This involves determining which entities, operations, and emissions sources are included in the company's GHG inventory, and how emissions are allocated and reported.

Under the GHG Protocol, companies can choose between two approaches for consolidating GHG emissions: the equity share approach and the control approach. The equity share approach allocates emissions based on the company's equity ownership in an entity, while the control approach allocates emissions based on the company's financial or operational control over an entity. Companies should choose the approach that best reflects their business structure and decision-making power, and apply it consistently across their operations.

In addition to organizational boundaries, companies need to set operational boundaries for their GHG inventory. This involves identifying and categorizing emissions sources within each of the three scopes defined by the GHG Protocol. For Scope 1 and 2 emissions, this typically includes sources such as:
- Stationary combustion (e.g., boilers, furnaces, generators)
- Mobile combustion (e.g., company vehicles, off-road equipment)
- Process emissions (e.g., chemical reactions, industrial processes)
- Fugitive emissions (e.g., leaks from refrigeration or air conditioning systems)
- Purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling

For Scope 3 emissions, the GHG Protocol defines 15 categories of upstream and downstream emissions that companies should consider, such as:
- Purchased goods and services
- Capital goods
- Fuel- and energy-related activities
- Upstream transportation and distribution
- Waste generated in operations
- Business travel
- Employee commuting
- Upstream leased assets
- Downstream transportation and distribution
- Processing of sold products
- Use of sold products
- End-of-life treatment of sold products
- Downstream leased assets
- Franchises
- Investments
Identifying and prioritizing which Scope 3 categories to include in the GHG inventory is a key challenge for many companies, as the data and methodologies for calculating these emissions can be complex and vary widely by sector and value chain. Companies should focus on the most relevant and material categories for their business, and use a combination of primary data (e.g., from suppliers or customers) and secondary data (e.g., industry averages or proxy data) to estimate emissions.

Collecting and Calculating Emissions Data

With organizational and operational boundaries set, the next step in GHG accounting is to collect and calculate emissions data for each source and scope identified. This involves gathering activity data (e.g., fuel consumption, electricity use, travel distance) and applying emission factors to convert the activity data into GHG emissions.

For Scope 1 emissions, activity data is typically collected from internal sources such as fuel purchase records, meter readings, or production logs. Emission factors for Scope 1 sources are generally well-established and can be obtained from government agencies, industry associations, or commercial databases.

For Scope 2 emissions, activity data is typically sourced from utility bills or energy management systems, while emission factors vary depending on the location and grid mix of the purchased energy. Companies can use location-based factors (based on the average grid mix) or market-based factors (based on contractual instruments like renewable energy certificates) to calculate Scope 2 emissions.

For Scope 3 emissions, data collection and calculation can be more complex and variable, depending on the category and level of influence the company has over its value chain partners. Companies may need to engage suppliers, customers, and other stakeholders to obtain primary activity data, or use secondary data sources such as industry databases, lifecycle assessment studies, or spend-based models to estimate emissions.

To ensure the accuracy and consistency of emissions data, companies should establish clear data management processes and controls, such as:

- Defining roles and responsibilities for data collection and reporting
- Establishing data quality standards and verification procedures
- Documenting data sources, assumptions, and methodologies
- Implementing data management systems and tools
- Conducting regular data audits and reviews
- Reporting and Disclosing Emissions

Once emissions data is collected and calculated, the next step is to report and disclose the information to internal and external stakeholders. GHG reporting serves several key functions, including:
- Informing internal decision-making and performance management
- Communicating progress and commitments to external stakeholders
- Complying with regulatory requirements and voluntary standards
- Benchmarking performance against industry peers and best practices
- Identifying opportunities for improvement and innovation

There are several key considerations and best practices for effective GHG reporting and disclosure, such as:
- Aligning with recognized reporting frameworks and standards, such as the GHG Protocol, CDP, TCFD, or GRI
- Providing clear and transparent information on organizational and operational boundaries, data sources and methodologies, and any significant changes or restatements from previous years
- Presenting emissions data in a consistent and comparable format, such as using standard units (e.g., tCO2e) and normalizing factors (e.g., emissions intensity per unit of production or revenue)
- Disclosing relevant context and performance indicators, such as emissions reduction targets, initiatives, and outcomes
- Obtaining third-party verification or assurance of emissions data and reports
- Engaging stakeholders in the reporting process and responding to their feedback and expectations
- Companies may choose to disclose their GHG emissions through a variety of channels and formats, such as annual sustainability reports, CDP questionnaires, investor presentations, or online platforms. Regardless of the specific approach, the key is to provide clear, consistent, and decision-useful information that enables stakeholders to understand and assess the company's climate performance and risks.

Verifying and Assuring Emissions Data

To enhance the credibility and reliability of GHG reporting, many companies choose to obtain third-party verification or assurance of their emissions data and disclosures. Verification involves an independent assessment of the accuracy and completeness of the company's GHG inventory, while assurance provides a higher level of confidence in the reliability of the information reported.

There are several key benefits of verifying and assuring GHG emissions data, such as:

- Improving the quality and consistency of emissions data and reporting
- Enhancing the credibility and trust of stakeholders in the company's climate performance and disclosures
- Meeting the requirements of certain reporting frameworks and standards (e.g., CDP, SBTi)
- Identifying areas for improvement in data management and reporting processes
- Demonstrating leadership and best practices in climate transparency and accountability

To obtain verification or assurance, companies typically engage an accredited third-party provider, such as a professional services firm or certification body, to conduct an independent review of their GHG inventory and reporting. The verification or assurance process typically involves several key steps, such as:

- Planning and scoping the engagement, including determining the level of assurance (e.g., limited or reasonable) and the specific procedures to be performed
- Assessing the company's GHG accounting and reporting processes and controls
- Testing the accuracy and completeness of emissions data and calculations
- Evaluating the consistency and appropriateness of methodologies and assumptions used
- Identifying any errors, omissions, or misstatements in the reported information
- Communicating the findings and conclusions of the engagement to the company and its stakeholders
- Companies should carefully consider the costs and benefits of verification and assurance, and select a provider that has the necessary expertise, independence, and credibility to meet their needs and stakeholder expectations.

Leveraging Technology Solutions for GHG Accounting

As the scope and complexity of GHG accounting continues to grow, many companies are turning to technology solutions to streamline and automate their data collection, calculation, and reporting processes. From carbon management software to IoT sensors and blockchain networks, a wide range of tools and platforms are emerging to help companies manage their GHG emissions more efficiently and effectively.

Some of the key benefits of leveraging technology solutions for GHG accounting include:

- Automating data collection and integration from multiple sources and systems
- Applying standardized calculation methodologies and emission factors
- Providing real-time visibility and analytics on emissions performance and trends
- Streamlining reporting and disclosure processes, including alignment with multiple frameworks and standards
- Enabling scenario analysis and forecasting to support target-setting and decision-making
- Facilitating collaboration and data sharing with value chain partners and stakeholders
- Enhancing data security, auditability, and traceability

When selecting and implementing technology solutions for GHG accounting, companies should consider several key factors, such as:

- Alignment with the company's specific needs and requirements, such as scope, scale, and complexity of emissions
- Integration with existing systems and data sources, such as ERP, supply chain, and sustainability platforms
- Flexibility and scalability to accommodate changing business and regulatory demands
- Ease of use and adoption by internal and external users
- Quality and reliability of data outputs and analytics
- Security and compliance with relevant data privacy and protection standards
- Total cost of ownership and return on investment
- Best Practices and Common Challenges in GHG Accounting

While GHG accounting provides a powerful tool for companies to measure and manage their climate impact, it is not without its challenges and pitfalls. Some of the common issues and obstacles that companies may face in their GHG accounting journey include:

- Lack of data availability, quality, and consistency, particularly for Scope 3 emissions
- Complexity and variability of calculation methodologies and assumptions across different sectors, regions, and value chains
- Limited internal resources and expertise to implement and maintain GHG accounting processes and systems
- Evolving and fragmented landscape of reporting frameworks, standards, and regulations
- Pressure to balance transparency and competitiveness in emissions disclosure and target-setting
- Difficulty in engaging and influencing upstream and downstream value chain partners
- Risk of greenwashing or misrepresentation of emissions performance and progress

To overcome these challenges and ensure the effectiveness and credibility of their GHG accounting programs, companies should adopt several key best practices, such as:
- Establishing strong governance and accountability structures for GHG accounting, with clear roles and responsibilities for data owners, managers, and users
- Developing a robust data management and quality assurance process, with regular audits and verification of emissions data and calculations
- Investing in capacity building and training for internal teams and stakeholders on GHG accounting concepts, methodologies, and tools
- Collaborating with industry peers, value chain partners, and external experts to share best practices, address common challenges, and drive standardization and harmonization of approaches
- Setting science-based and context-specific emissions reduction targets, with clear action plans and progress tracking mechanisms
- Communicating openly and transparently about the company's GHG accounting methodologies, assumptions, and limitations, as well as its emissions performance and reduction initiatives
- Integrating GHG accounting into core business strategy and decision-making processes, such as risk management, investment planning, and product development

The Future of GHG Accounting and Reporting

As the world transitions to a low-carbon economy, the importance and expectations for corporate GHG accounting and reporting will only continue to grow. Governments, investors, customers, and civil society are increasingly demanding more comprehensive, consistent, and credible disclosure of companies' climate impacts and risks, as well as their strategies and progress towards net-zero emissions.

To meet these evolving demands and drive meaningful action on climate change, the field of GHG accounting will need to continue to innovate and mature. Some of the key trends and developments to watch in the coming years include:

- Increasing standardization and harmonization of GHG accounting and reporting frameworks, such as the convergence of CDP, CDSB, GRI, IIRC, and SASB into a unified global reporting system
- Expansion and refinement of Scope 3 emissions accounting, with more sector-specific guidance and tools for measuring and managing value chain emissions
- Integration of GHG accounting with other sustainability and ESG issues, such as climate risk, water, biodiversity, and social impact.

About Newtral

Newtral AI Platform- Enterprise ESG Platform for Corporates and Supply Chain 

We help organizations automate their ESG metric measurements, tracking and reporting across company as well as their supply chain. Our platform solves for all corporate sustainability reporting and carbon accounting needs.

Schedule Exclusive Demo

Learn how Newtral helps sustainability teams. The only tool sustainability teams need to measure, track, and improve ESG metrics, ensuring global compliances within budget.

Book a demo